<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 568 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334550</link>
    <description>In this central excise matter, the Supreme Court recorded dismissal of the appeal. The supplied excerpt contains no reasoning, issue framing, or operative legal principle beyond the bare dismissal, so no further substantive holding can be extracted from the text. The citation shows a dispute between the assessee and the revenue, but the document itself does not disclose the grounds on which relief was refused.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2016 15:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=448072" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 568 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334550</link>
      <description>In this central excise matter, the Supreme Court recorded dismissal of the appeal. The supplied excerpt contains no reasoning, issue framing, or operative legal principle beyond the bare dismissal, so no further substantive holding can be extracted from the text. The citation shows a dispute between the assessee and the revenue, but the document itself does not disclose the grounds on which relief was refused.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334550</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>