<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 566 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334548</link>
    <description>Special leave petitions in a central excise matter were dismissed by the SC, with dismissal recorded both for delay and on merits. The order reflects that no further interference was warranted at the leave stage, and the challenge did not survive either on the procedural objection of delay or on substantive examination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2016 13:32:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=448070" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 566 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334548</link>
      <description>Special leave petitions in a central excise matter were dismissed by the SC, with dismissal recorded both for delay and on merits. The order reflects that no further interference was warranted at the leave stage, and the challenge did not survive either on the procedural objection of delay or on substantive examination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334548</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>