https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334547 The appeals were dismissed because the tax effect was low, and the Court declined to entertain them on that ground alone. The question of law raised was expressly left open, so no substantive ruling was given on the merits of the central excise issue. en-us Tue, 12 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 16 Nov 2016 13:32:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334547 The appeals were dismissed because the tax effect was low, and the Court declined to entertain them on that ground alone. The question of law raised was expressly left open, so no substantive ruling was given on the merits of the central excise issue. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 12 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334547