https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334546 The Department stated that the tax effect was nominal, so the Supreme Court dismissed the matter on that ground and left the question of law open. No substantive ruling was given on the underlying central excise issue, and the order records only the dismissal based on low tax effect. en-us Mon, 11 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 16 Nov 2016 13:32:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334546 The Department stated that the tax effect was nominal, so the Supreme Court dismissed the matter on that ground and left the question of law open. No substantive ruling was given on the underlying central excise issue, and the order records only the dismissal based on low tax effect. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 11 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334546