<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 561 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334543</link>
    <description>The appeal was disposed of by applying the doctrine of stare decisis: the determinative issue was already covered by the Court&#039;s earlier order dated 25-10-2007 in Union of India v. Tata SSL Ltd. The appellant&#039;s counsel conceded that the prior decision governed the matter, so the present appeal could not be maintained and was dismissed on that authority. The Court recorded that no costs would be awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2016 13:32:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=448065" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 561 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334543</link>
      <description>The appeal was disposed of by applying the doctrine of stare decisis: the determinative issue was already covered by the Court&#039;s earlier order dated 25-10-2007 in Union of India v. Tata SSL Ltd. The appellant&#039;s counsel conceded that the prior decision governed the matter, so the present appeal could not be maintained and was dismissed on that authority. The Court recorded that no costs would be awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334543</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>