https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334541 The High Court upheld the order passed by the revisional authority for the confiscation of undeclared gold jewelry and imposition of a penalty. The court found that the petitioner failed to meet the conditions of an "eligible passenger" and attempted to evade customs duty by not declaring the jewelry. Despite the petitioner's arguments, including seeking permission for re-export, the court supported the confiscation based on independent reasons provided in the impugned order. The High Court declined to interfere with the decision, dismissing the writ petition without costs. en-us Tue, 08 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 21 Aug 2017 12:37:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334541 The High Court upheld the order passed by the revisional authority for the confiscation of undeclared gold jewelry and imposition of a penalty. The court found that the petitioner failed to meet the conditions of an "eligible passenger" and attempted to evade customs duty by not declaring the jewelry. Despite the petitioner's arguments, including seeking permission for re-export, the court supported the confiscation based on independent reasons provided in the impugned order. The High Court declined to interfere with the decision, dismissing the writ petition without costs. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 08 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334541