https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334537 The court directed the first respondent to release the imported goods within two weeks, as the delay was due to the non-appearance of the IEC holder, not the Department's actions. The court noted that the SIIB recommended the release in accordance with the law and was not investigating the case. The writ petition was disposed of with this direction, and no costs were imposed. en-us Thu, 18 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 16 Nov 2016 13:13:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334537 The court directed the first respondent to release the imported goods within two weeks, as the delay was due to the non-appearance of the IEC holder, not the Department's actions. The court noted that the SIIB recommended the release in accordance with the law and was not investigating the case. The writ petition was disposed of with this direction, and no costs were imposed. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 18 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334537