<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 554 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334536</link>
    <description>The court allowed the condonation of a one-day delay in filing the Letters Patent Appeal. The appellant, who provided information leading to investigations and penalties on a company, was found not entitled to reward money due to unsuccessful appeal outcomes and policy guidelines requiring successful adjudication and realization of the demand. The court dismissed the appeal, affirming that reward payments are discretionary and not enforceable as a matter of right.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2017 17:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=448052" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 554 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334536</link>
      <description>The court allowed the condonation of a one-day delay in filing the Letters Patent Appeal. The appellant, who provided information leading to investigations and penalties on a company, was found not entitled to reward money due to unsuccessful appeal outcomes and policy guidelines requiring successful adjudication and realization of the demand. The court dismissed the appeal, affirming that reward payments are discretionary and not enforceable as a matter of right.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334536</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>