<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 549 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334531</link>
    <description>The court set aside the assessment orders for the years 2009-10 to 2015-16 under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006, due to a violation of natural justice. The petitioner, a registered dealer, was not given an opportunity to respond as requested documents were not provided before the orders were passed. The court ordered the return of seized cheques and instructed the respondent to provide the documents within two weeks for the petitioner to submit objections within 15 days. The matter was remitted back to the respondent for fresh consideration, with a requirement for a personal hearing opportunity. No costs were imposed on the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2016 12:18:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=448023" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 549 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334531</link>
      <description>The court set aside the assessment orders for the years 2009-10 to 2015-16 under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006, due to a violation of natural justice. The petitioner, a registered dealer, was not given an opportunity to respond as requested documents were not provided before the orders were passed. The court ordered the return of seized cheques and instructed the respondent to provide the documents within two weeks for the petitioner to submit objections within 15 days. The matter was remitted back to the respondent for fresh consideration, with a requirement for a personal hearing opportunity. No costs were imposed on the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334531</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>