<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 544 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334526</link>
    <description>An application under Section 8 is not defeated by initial non-filing of the original or certified copy of the arbitration agreement if the document is on record when the court considers the application. The phrase &quot;shall not be entertained&quot; was read as barring merits review only until the agreement is produced, so the objection failed once the deeds were before the court. A non-signatory defendant did not prevent reference to arbitration where the dispute substantially arose from deeds containing arbitration clauses. The dispute was also arbitrable despite the alleged unregistered status of the partnership, because the parties had agreed to arbitrate disputes arising from the partnership arrangements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2025 15:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=447993" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 544 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334526</link>
      <description>An application under Section 8 is not defeated by initial non-filing of the original or certified copy of the arbitration agreement if the document is on record when the court considers the application. The phrase &quot;shall not be entertained&quot; was read as barring merits review only until the agreement is produced, so the objection failed once the deeds were before the court. A non-signatory defendant did not prevent reference to arbitration where the dispute substantially arose from deeds containing arbitration clauses. The dispute was also arbitrable despite the alleged unregistered status of the partnership, because the parties had agreed to arbitrate disputes arising from the partnership arrangements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334526</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>