https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188019 The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the redemption fine and penalty, and allowed the appeal with any consequential relief. The excess stock allegation was not substantiated due to the lack of physical stock taking, leading to the dismissal of duty demand and overturning of the penalties imposed on the appellant. en-us Mon, 15 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 16 Nov 2016 11:36:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188019 The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the redemption fine and penalty, and allowed the appeal with any consequential relief. The excess stock allegation was not substantiated due to the lack of physical stock taking, leading to the dismissal of duty demand and overturning of the penalties imposed on the appellant. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 15 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188019