<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 1163 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188026</link>
    <description>The court directed the respondents to treat the writ petitions as representations and decide on them within two weeks, emphasizing the petitioners&#039; cooperation in addressing their grievances regarding the export of goods and issuance of detention certificates. The court noted the financial loss and damage to the petitioners&#039; reputation due to the delay in shipping their consignments despite Customs approval for exports.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2017 17:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=447972" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 1163 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188026</link>
      <description>The court directed the respondents to treat the writ petitions as representations and decide on them within two weeks, emphasizing the petitioners&#039; cooperation in addressing their grievances regarding the export of goods and issuance of detention certificates. The court noted the financial loss and damage to the petitioners&#039; reputation due to the delay in shipping their consignments despite Customs approval for exports.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188026</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>