<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 2571 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188031</link>
    <description>A 100% export oriented unit was granted exemption from the operation of the Plastic Wastes (Management and Handling) Rules, 2011 during the pendency of the proceedings, on the basis that its position was materially identical to earlier comparable cases involving similarly placed units. Parity between writ petitioners in the same factual situation was maintained, and the relief was made conditional on strict adherence to the undertaking already furnished in the affidavit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2016 11:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=447967" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 2571 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188031</link>
      <description>A 100% export oriented unit was granted exemption from the operation of the Plastic Wastes (Management and Handling) Rules, 2011 during the pendency of the proceedings, on the basis that its position was materially identical to earlier comparable cases involving similarly placed units. Parity between writ petitioners in the same factual situation was maintained, and the relief was made conditional on strict adherence to the undertaking already furnished in the affidavit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188031</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>