<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 1599 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188040</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision to grant a refund to the respondents, manufacturers of pneumatic tyres and inner tubes, for duty paid on goods cleared for in-house testing. The Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the refund claim was dismissed, as the evidence supported that testing was conducted within the factory premises, complying with duty payment requirements. The judgment affirmed the validity of the refund, concluding that there was no fault in the Commissioner&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2016 11:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=447958" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 1599 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188040</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision to grant a refund to the respondents, manufacturers of pneumatic tyres and inner tubes, for duty paid on goods cleared for in-house testing. The Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the refund claim was dismissed, as the evidence supported that testing was conducted within the factory premises, complying with duty payment requirements. The judgment affirmed the validity of the refund, concluding that there was no fault in the Commissioner&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188040</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>