<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (6) TMI 536 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188010</link>
    <description>The appeal was against an Order-in-Appeal upholding duty demand and interest but setting aside the penalty under Section 11AC. The Commissioner (Appeals) based the decision on the payment of duty and interest before the show cause notice was issued, following legal principles. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal, finding no merit in the argument for mandatory penalty under Section 11AC.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2016 17:59:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=447902" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (6) TMI 536 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188010</link>
      <description>The appeal was against an Order-in-Appeal upholding duty demand and interest but setting aside the penalty under Section 11AC. The Commissioner (Appeals) based the decision on the payment of duty and interest before the show cause notice was issued, following legal principles. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal, finding no merit in the argument for mandatory penalty under Section 11AC.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188010</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>