<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 538 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334520</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the deletion of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for the Assessment year 2006-07. The decision emphasized the bonafide belief of the Respondent, a Netherlands-based company, in not offering income for tax based on its interpretation of the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement with India. Both the CIT(A) and the Tribunal found the Respondent&#039;s conduct bonafide, with no concealment of income or furnishing of inaccurate particulars. The appeal was dismissed as the issue did not raise any substantial question of law, highlighting the importance of disclosing details and interpretations in tax matters to avoid penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2016 13:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=447893" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 538 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334520</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the deletion of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for the Assessment year 2006-07. The decision emphasized the bonafide belief of the Respondent, a Netherlands-based company, in not offering income for tax based on its interpretation of the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement with India. Both the CIT(A) and the Tribunal found the Respondent&#039;s conduct bonafide, with no concealment of income or furnishing of inaccurate particulars. The appeal was dismissed as the issue did not raise any substantial question of law, highlighting the importance of disclosing details and interpretations in tax matters to avoid penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334520</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>