<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 528 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334510</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete additions under section 40(a)(ia) based on the correct deduction of TDS by the appellant. The Tribunal emphasized that the payments included various services beyond rent, concluding that no disallowance was warranted under section 40(a)(ia).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2016 17:57:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=447883" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 528 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334510</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete additions under section 40(a)(ia) based on the correct deduction of TDS by the appellant. The Tribunal emphasized that the payments included various services beyond rent, concluding that no disallowance was warranted under section 40(a)(ia).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334510</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>