<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (12) TMI 4 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5705</link>
    <description>Whether receipts arising during construction of a new industrial plant were taxable income or capital receipts turned on whether they were inextricably linked to the setting-up activity. The SC held that advances and related recoveries/receipts from contractors (including rent/amenities for housing contractor personnel and other connected recoveries) were intrinsically connected with construction, were adjusted against contractor bills, and reduced the cost of construction; they therefore constituted capital receipts not chargeable to tax. On interest, the SC applied the &quot;real income&quot; doctrine, holding that an interest entry later reversed due to a change in the transaction did not result in any real accrual and was not exigible to income-tax. Appeals were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2025 15:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=44788" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (12) TMI 4 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5705</link>
      <description>Whether receipts arising during construction of a new industrial plant were taxable income or capital receipts turned on whether they were inextricably linked to the setting-up activity. The SC held that advances and related recoveries/receipts from contractors (including rent/amenities for housing contractor personnel and other connected recoveries) were intrinsically connected with construction, were adjusted against contractor bills, and reduced the cost of construction; they therefore constituted capital receipts not chargeable to tax. On interest, the SC applied the &quot;real income&quot; doctrine, holding that an interest entry later reversed due to a change in the transaction did not result in any real accrual and was not exigible to income-tax. Appeals were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5705</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>