<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (7) TMI 685 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188008</link>
    <description>Penalty was held unsustainable where wrongly availed credit had been reversed with interest before issuance of the show cause notice, and the lapse was found to be a bona fide procedural error without mala fide intent. The adjudicatory finding accepted that the omission arose from lack of communication and not from any attempt to derive undue advantage. The appellate authority relied on precedent supporting the view that penalty is not justified in such circumstances, while the Revenue&#039;s cited decisions were treated as inapplicable. On that basis, the assessee succeeded on the penalty issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2016 17:49:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=447878" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (7) TMI 685 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188008</link>
      <description>Penalty was held unsustainable where wrongly availed credit had been reversed with interest before issuance of the show cause notice, and the lapse was found to be a bona fide procedural error without mala fide intent. The adjudicatory finding accepted that the omission arose from lack of communication and not from any attempt to derive undue advantage. The appellate authority relied on precedent supporting the view that penalty is not justified in such circumstances, while the Revenue&#039;s cited decisions were treated as inapplicable. On that basis, the assessee succeeded on the penalty issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188008</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>