<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (10) TMI 463 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188007</link>
    <description>The term &quot;heirs&quot; in a will was construed in its legal sense, so that daughters were included as legal heirs after the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, unless the testament showed a contrary intention. The will had to be read as a whole, and the differing use of &quot;heirs&quot; and &quot;children&quot; supported rejection of a sex-based exclusion. A suit challenging a sale deed based on a limited life interest was also not dismissed as premature or time-barred, because the enforceable cause of action matured on the life holder&#039;s death and subsequent events could be considered to mould relief. The High Court&#039;s relief was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2024 13:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=447870" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (10) TMI 463 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188007</link>
      <description>The term &quot;heirs&quot; in a will was construed in its legal sense, so that daughters were included as legal heirs after the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, unless the testament showed a contrary intention. The will had to be read as a whole, and the differing use of &quot;heirs&quot; and &quot;children&quot; supported rejection of a sex-based exclusion. A suit challenging a sale deed based on a limited life interest was also not dismissed as premature or time-barred, because the enforceable cause of action matured on the life holder&#039;s death and subsequent events could be considered to mould relief. The High Court&#039;s relief was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188007</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>