https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334503 The tribunal concluded that Cenvat credit and refund were admissible for services used in providing export services. Discrepancies in invoices were considered clerical errors, and services to SEZ units were valid for refund. A computation error led to remanding the matter for correct calculation. The appeals were remanded solely for re-quantification of the refund amount. en-us Fri, 07 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 10 Apr 2017 14:17:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334503 The tribunal concluded that Cenvat credit and refund were admissible for services used in providing export services. Discrepancies in invoices were considered clerical errors, and services to SEZ units were valid for refund. A computation error led to remanding the matter for correct calculation. The appeals were remanded solely for re-quantification of the refund amount. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 07 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334503