<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 519 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334501</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the adjudicating Commissioner&#039;s findings that the demands were barred by limitation and set aside the orders relating to deemed discharge. The appeals of both Revenue and the assessee were comprehensively addressed, with the Tribunal providing detailed reasoning for its decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2017 12:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=447832" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 519 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334501</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the adjudicating Commissioner&#039;s findings that the demands were barred by limitation and set aside the orders relating to deemed discharge. The appeals of both Revenue and the assessee were comprehensively addressed, with the Tribunal providing detailed reasoning for its decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334501</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>