<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 518 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334500</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting the Appellant abatement of 40% under relevant notifications, reducing the service tax liability to Rs. 34,38,279. Penalties under Sections 76, 77, and 78 were waived, except for the penalty under Section 75A due to registration non-compliance. The Appellant&#039;s financial constraints and lack of malafide intent were considered, resulting in relief from penalties and reduced service tax liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2017 13:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=447831" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 518 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334500</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting the Appellant abatement of 40% under relevant notifications, reducing the service tax liability to Rs. 34,38,279. Penalties under Sections 76, 77, and 78 were waived, except for the penalty under Section 75A due to registration non-compliance. The Appellant&#039;s financial constraints and lack of malafide intent were considered, resulting in relief from penalties and reduced service tax liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334500</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>