<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 516 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334498</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the taxability of services provided by M/s B M Chapalkar &amp;amp; Sons to M/s Nasik Thermal Power Station, including cleaning activity, transportation of goods by road, and site formation services under the Finance Act, 1994. Penalties were confirmed by the original authority but reduced penalties were allowed under specific conditions. The disputed demand, interest, and penalties were set aside by the Commissioner of Central Excise &amp;amp; Customs (Appeals) for some services, leading to further arguments. The tribunal clarified the tax liabilities, dismissed appeals, and provided clarity on the interpretation of relevant statutory provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2017 11:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=447829" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 516 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334498</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the taxability of services provided by M/s B M Chapalkar &amp;amp; Sons to M/s Nasik Thermal Power Station, including cleaning activity, transportation of goods by road, and site formation services under the Finance Act, 1994. Penalties were confirmed by the original authority but reduced penalties were allowed under specific conditions. The disputed demand, interest, and penalties were set aside by the Commissioner of Central Excise &amp;amp; Customs (Appeals) for some services, leading to further arguments. The tribunal clarified the tax liabilities, dismissed appeals, and provided clarity on the interpretation of relevant statutory provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334498</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>