https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334497 The appellate tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the petitioner. It held that the extended limitation period was not applicable as the petitioner did not dispute the service classification or tax liability, had already remitted a portion, and there was no wilful suppression of facts. The tribunal found the situation revenue neutral due to cenvat credit availability, deeming the service tax for the extended period unsustainable and imposing no penalty. en-us Fri, 23 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 08 Apr 2017 10:53:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334497 The appellate tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the petitioner. It held that the extended limitation period was not applicable as the petitioner did not dispute the service classification or tax liability, had already remitted a portion, and there was no wilful suppression of facts. The tribunal found the situation revenue neutral due to cenvat credit availability, deeming the service tax for the extended period unsustainable and imposing no penalty. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 23 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334497