<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 1142 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188004</link>
    <description>An SEZ-based 100% Export Oriented Unit sought relief under Article 32 to enable export of pan masala, gutkha and tobacco in multilayered plastic sachets despite the Plastic Wastes (Management &amp; Handling) Rules, 2011. The petitioners filed sworn undertakings that they would operate only as an exporter, would not sell the products in India, would not establish a domestic manufacturing unit for such goods, would not extend the claimed exemption to waste and rejects, and would not re-import exported goods for domestic sale. On that basis, the Union stated that the unit would be exempted from the Rules for the specified export activity, and the Court disposed of the writ petition as infructuous without adjudicating the substantive challenge.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2017 17:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=447827" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 1142 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188004</link>
      <description>An SEZ-based 100% Export Oriented Unit sought relief under Article 32 to enable export of pan masala, gutkha and tobacco in multilayered plastic sachets despite the Plastic Wastes (Management &amp; Handling) Rules, 2011. The petitioners filed sworn undertakings that they would operate only as an exporter, would not sell the products in India, would not establish a domestic manufacturing unit for such goods, would not extend the claimed exemption to waste and rejects, and would not re-import exported goods for domestic sale. On that basis, the Union stated that the unit would be exempted from the Rules for the specified export activity, and the Court disposed of the writ petition as infructuous without adjudicating the substantive challenge.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188004</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>