<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (1) TMI 5 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5695</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court ruled that in a case involving the assessment of profits distributed among beneficiaries of a trust, the income should be assessed in the hands of the beneficiaries. The Court referred to a previous decision in CIT v. Kamalini Khatau [1994] 209 ITR 101 to support this conclusion. The appeals were allowed in favor of the assessee with no order as to costs. (1998 (1) TMI 5 - SC)</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2018 16:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=44778" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (1) TMI 5 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5695</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court ruled that in a case involving the assessment of profits distributed among beneficiaries of a trust, the income should be assessed in the hands of the beneficiaries. The Court referred to a previous decision in CIT v. Kamalini Khatau [1994] 209 ITR 101 to support this conclusion. The appeals were allowed in favor of the assessee with no order as to costs. (1998 (1) TMI 5 - SC)</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5695</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>