<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 504 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334486</link>
    <description>Dismantled defective fans stored as separate parts lose their identifiable identity as fans for central excise purposes. Reassembly after replacing defective components and reusing workable parts constitutes repair and servicing, not manufacture under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, because no new product emerges. The activity therefore does not attract central excise as manufacture.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2017 10:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=447705" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 504 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334486</link>
      <description>Dismantled defective fans stored as separate parts lose their identifiable identity as fans for central excise purposes. Reassembly after replacing defective components and reusing workable parts constitutes repair and servicing, not manufacture under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, because no new product emerges. The activity therefore does not attract central excise as manufacture.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334486</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>