<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 1160 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187989</link>
    <description>The High Court clarified that interim orders under Section 35C(2A) of the Central Excise Act cannot exceed 365 days, as per precedent. The Court directed the Tribunal to decide the appeal within six months and advised the appellant to reapply for a stay extension following due process. This ruling balanced parties&#039; rights and promoted timely appeal resolution in tax cases, ensuring efficient justice administration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2016 10:35:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=447697" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 1160 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187989</link>
      <description>The High Court clarified that interim orders under Section 35C(2A) of the Central Excise Act cannot exceed 365 days, as per precedent. The Court directed the Tribunal to decide the appeal within six months and advised the appellant to reapply for a stay extension following due process. This ruling balanced parties&#039; rights and promoted timely appeal resolution in tax cases, ensuring efficient justice administration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187989</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>