https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334484 Parity with earlier writ petitions justified extending exemption from the operation of the Plastic Wastes (Management & Handling) Rules, 2011 to a later petitioner where the facts were materially identical and the petitioner was a 100% export-oriented unit. The Court followed earlier orders granting exemption, treated the pending review as not displacing that approach, and confirmed interim relief on the same basis. The operative principle is that similarly placed parties should receive the same regulatory relief unless a legally sustainable distinction is shown. en-us Mon, 18 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 15 Nov 2016 10:34:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334484 Parity with earlier writ petitions justified extending exemption from the operation of the Plastic Wastes (Management & Handling) Rules, 2011 to a later petitioner where the facts were materially identical and the petitioner was a 100% export-oriented unit. The Court followed earlier orders granting exemption, treated the pending review as not displacing that approach, and confirmed interim relief on the same basis. The operative principle is that similarly placed parties should receive the same regulatory relief unless a legally sustainable distinction is shown. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 18 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334484