<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 494 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334476</link>
    <description>The High Court of Madras addressed challenges to assessment orders for multiple years, focusing on alleged belated tax payment and penalty levy. The court emphasized the importance of petitioner receiving notices, questioned completion of assessment without confirmation, and noted discrepancies leading to disputed interest payments. The court granted petitioner an opportunity to present case before the Assessing Officer, directing payment of disputed tax and objections submission. The court set aside demands, ordered re-doing of assessments, and remanded the matter for further consideration, emphasizing procedural fairness and adequate opportunities for petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2016 10:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=447687" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 494 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334476</link>
      <description>The High Court of Madras addressed challenges to assessment orders for multiple years, focusing on alleged belated tax payment and penalty levy. The court emphasized the importance of petitioner receiving notices, questioned completion of assessment without confirmation, and noted discrepancies leading to disputed interest payments. The court granted petitioner an opportunity to present case before the Assessing Officer, directing payment of disputed tax and objections submission. The court set aside demands, ordered re-doing of assessments, and remanded the matter for further consideration, emphasizing procedural fairness and adequate opportunities for petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334476</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>