<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (6) TMI 2 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5685</link>
    <description>Interest on Government securities and dividends on shares received by a co-operative bank were treated as income attributable to its banking business, so they qualified for deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court accepted the Tribunal&#039;s factual finding that the income arose from the assessee&#039;s banking activity and noted that the Revenue failed to dislodge that finding. A contrary authority on Government securities was distinguished as resting on a different factual basis and not on a finding of business attribution. The Revenue&#039;s challenge therefore failed, and the assessee&#039;s claim to deduction was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2025 13:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=44768" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (6) TMI 2 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5685</link>
      <description>Interest on Government securities and dividends on shares received by a co-operative bank were treated as income attributable to its banking business, so they qualified for deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court accepted the Tribunal&#039;s factual finding that the income arose from the assessee&#039;s banking activity and noted that the Revenue failed to dislodge that finding. A contrary authority on Government securities was distinguished as resting on a different factual basis and not on a finding of business attribution. The Revenue&#039;s challenge therefore failed, and the assessee&#039;s claim to deduction was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5685</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>