https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334475 The court dismissed the writ petition, emphasizing that the petitioner must utilize the appellate remedy. It upheld the respondent's jurisdiction to issue the order, affirmed the co-owners' classification as an Association of Persons (AOP), and rejected the petitioner's attempt to change this classification. The court implied the validity of the extended period of limitation invoked by the respondent and deemed the writ petition not maintainable due to the petitioner's failure to pursue the available appellate route. en-us Wed, 02 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 28 Aug 2017 11:39:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334475 The court dismissed the writ petition, emphasizing that the petitioner must utilize the appellate remedy. It upheld the respondent's jurisdiction to issue the order, affirmed the co-owners' classification as an Association of Persons (AOP), and rejected the petitioner's attempt to change this classification. The court implied the validity of the extended period of limitation invoked by the respondent and deemed the writ petition not maintainable due to the petitioner's failure to pursue the available appellate route. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 02 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334475