<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (12) TMI 10 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5684</link>
    <description>Whether written-off amounts due for commodities supplied qualified as allowable bad debts turned on whether the debt had become irrecoverable and when it became bad. The SC held that both the occurrence of badness and its timing are pure questions of fact, and no question of law arose warranting interference. Consequently, the appeal challenging the disallowance was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2025 13:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=44767" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (12) TMI 10 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5684</link>
      <description>Whether written-off amounts due for commodities supplied qualified as allowable bad debts turned on whether the debt had become irrecoverable and when it became bad. The SC held that both the occurrence of badness and its timing are pure questions of fact, and no question of law arose warranting interference. Consequently, the appeal challenging the disallowance was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5684</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>