https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334469 In a service tax dispute on goods transport agency services, the Tribunal held that 75% abatement on transportation charges had already been allowed and the demand, interest and penalty were to be recomputed accordingly. On limitation, it found that liability to pay service tax was clear from 1 January 2005, so a plea of bona fide belief or confusion did not bar invocation of the extended period in the absence of a legally sustainable explanation for non-payment. The extended period was therefore upheld and the appeal dismissed. en-us Thu, 03 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 14 Nov 2016 22:48:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334469 In a service tax dispute on goods transport agency services, the Tribunal held that 75% abatement on transportation charges had already been allowed and the demand, interest and penalty were to be recomputed accordingly. On limitation, it found that liability to pay service tax was clear from 1 January 2005, so a plea of bona fide belief or confusion did not bar invocation of the extended period in the absence of a legally sustainable explanation for non-payment. The extended period was therefore upheld and the appeal dismissed. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 03 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334469