https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334465 The Court held that the revisional authority erred in imposing conditions beyond those prescribed under Rule 18 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, specifically adherence to SION norms, while granting rebate on duty paid. The Court found that Rule 18 does not mention adherence to SION norms and declared the revisional authority's order erroneous. Consequently, the Court restored the original orders approving the rebate claim, emphasizing that the petitioner had fulfilled all prescribed conditions. en-us Wed, 02 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 21 Aug 2017 11:47:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334465 The Court held that the revisional authority erred in imposing conditions beyond those prescribed under Rule 18 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, specifically adherence to SION norms, while granting rebate on duty paid. The Court found that Rule 18 does not mention adherence to SION norms and declared the revisional authority's order erroneous. Consequently, the Court restored the original orders approving the rebate claim, emphasizing that the petitioner had fulfilled all prescribed conditions. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 02 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334465