https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334461 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Bangalore addressed appeals regarding the denial of CENVAT credit for service tax on goods transportation. The Tribunal held that the warehouse constituted the place of removal, allowing the appellant, a cigarette manufacturer, to avail CENVAT credit. Emphasizing legal principles and Circulars, the Tribunal set aside the impugned orders for the appellant and upheld them for the Revenue. This decision underscores the importance of the place of removal in determining CENVAT credit eligibility, providing a thorough analysis of the relevant issues and precedents. en-us Wed, 09 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 01 Sep 2017 14:58:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334461 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Bangalore addressed appeals regarding the denial of CENVAT credit for service tax on goods transportation. The Tribunal held that the warehouse constituted the place of removal, allowing the appellant, a cigarette manufacturer, to avail CENVAT credit. Emphasizing legal principles and Circulars, the Tribunal set aside the impugned orders for the appellant and upheld them for the Revenue. This decision underscores the importance of the place of removal in determining CENVAT credit eligibility, providing a thorough analysis of the relevant issues and precedents. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 09 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334461