https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334460 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that refund claims within one year from the date of filing are timely, while claims before this period are time-barred. The case was remanded for quantification and approval of the refund by the original adjudicating authority. The rejection of the refund claim based on filing frequency was overturned, emphasizing that monthly filing was not mandatory for all claims. en-us Wed, 09 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 14 Nov 2016 20:32:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334460 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that refund claims within one year from the date of filing are timely, while claims before this period are time-barred. The case was remanded for quantification and approval of the refund by the original adjudicating authority. The rejection of the refund claim based on filing frequency was overturned, emphasizing that monthly filing was not mandatory for all claims. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 09 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334460