<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 471 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334453</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, reducing the penalty amount equal to the credit taken on clearances to customers. The appellants were found eligible for credit on remaining amounts with reference to clearances to depot and consignment agents, while the disallowance of credits for SEZ units and customers was upheld. The decision was pronounced on 28/10/2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2017 16:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=447651" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 471 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334453</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, reducing the penalty amount equal to the credit taken on clearances to customers. The appellants were found eligible for credit on remaining amounts with reference to clearances to depot and consignment agents, while the disallowance of credits for SEZ units and customers was upheld. The decision was pronounced on 28/10/2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334453</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>