https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187979 The Supreme Court allowed the State of Karnataka's appeals against the High Court's decision to set aside the conviction of the respondents and order a retrial. The High Court's finding of procedural irregularity in the transfer of the case was deemed unfounded as there was no order of transfer under section 407 Cr.P.C. The Supreme Court clarified that the Principal Sessions Judge had the authority to transfer the case, and the trial by the III Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge was valid. Emphasizing that procedural errors do not warrant reversal unless they cause a failure of justice, the Supreme Court set aside the High Court's decision and remitted the appeals for disposal on merits. en-us Mon, 16 Feb 1987 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 14 Nov 2016 18:28:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187979 The Supreme Court allowed the State of Karnataka's appeals against the High Court's decision to set aside the conviction of the respondents and order a retrial. The High Court's finding of procedural irregularity in the transfer of the case was deemed unfounded as there was no order of transfer under section 407 Cr.P.C. The Supreme Court clarified that the Principal Sessions Judge had the authority to transfer the case, and the trial by the III Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge was valid. Emphasizing that procedural errors do not warrant reversal unless they cause a failure of justice, the Supreme Court set aside the High Court's decision and remitted the appeals for disposal on merits. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 16 Feb 1987 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187979