<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 1500 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187975</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the CIT&#039;s order invoking Section 263 for assessment years 2003-04 and 2004-05. It held that the AO&#039;s decision was one of the possible interpretations at the time of the original assessment, and the retrospective amendment did not make the order erroneous or prejudicial to revenue interests. The appeals of the assessee were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2016 17:02:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=447639" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 1500 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187975</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the CIT&#039;s order invoking Section 263 for assessment years 2003-04 and 2004-05. It held that the AO&#039;s decision was one of the possible interpretations at the time of the original assessment, and the retrospective amendment did not make the order erroneous or prejudicial to revenue interests. The appeals of the assessee were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187975</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>