https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334451 The High Court upheld the order dismissing W.P.(C) No.8417/2015, affirming the penalty imposed for non-fulfillment of export obligations under the FTDR Act, 1992. The appellant failed to provide authenticated documents to prove export obligation fulfillment as required by the license terms, resulting in the imposition of penalties. The Court found that the appellant's submissions were inadequate and upheld the penalty under Section 11(2) of the FTDR Act, 1992, emphasizing the failure to produce essential documents rather than a dispute over the interpretation of relevant provisions. en-us Tue, 08 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 Feb 2017 17:48:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334451 The High Court upheld the order dismissing W.P.(C) No.8417/2015, affirming the penalty imposed for non-fulfillment of export obligations under the FTDR Act, 1992. The appellant failed to provide authenticated documents to prove export obligation fulfillment as required by the license terms, resulting in the imposition of penalties. The Court found that the appellant's submissions were inadequate and upheld the penalty under Section 11(2) of the FTDR Act, 1992, emphasizing the failure to produce essential documents rather than a dispute over the interpretation of relevant provisions. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 08 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334451