<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 465 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334447</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the appellants violated the Foreign Trade Policy by selling goods in the domestic market before fulfilling export obligations. They also breached Handbook of Procedures regulations by not declaring actual raw material consumption. The Handbook cannot override Foreign Trade Policy or Customs notifications. Customs Appraisal Manual provisions were deemed inapplicable. The Tribunal upheld confiscation and imposed fines despite goods not being available. Penalties under the Customs Act were upheld for non-compliance with advance license conditions. The Tribunal&#039;s decisions were largely upheld, with some modifications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Dec 2017 12:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=447620" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 465 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334447</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the appellants violated the Foreign Trade Policy by selling goods in the domestic market before fulfilling export obligations. They also breached Handbook of Procedures regulations by not declaring actual raw material consumption. The Handbook cannot override Foreign Trade Policy or Customs notifications. Customs Appraisal Manual provisions were deemed inapplicable. The Tribunal upheld confiscation and imposed fines despite goods not being available. Penalties under the Customs Act were upheld for non-compliance with advance license conditions. The Tribunal&#039;s decisions were largely upheld, with some modifications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334447</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>