<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 464 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334446</link>
    <description>The court upheld Regulation 6(1)(l) of the Cargo Regulations, finding it within the scope of the Customs Act and not in violation of constitutional provisions. The challenge to the regulation, brought by DIAL, was dismissed. The court emphasized DIAL&#039;s ability to seek guidance from the Central Government regarding customs authorities&#039; directions, ultimately leading to the petition&#039;s dismissal with no costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Apr 2017 12:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=447619" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 464 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334446</link>
      <description>The court upheld Regulation 6(1)(l) of the Cargo Regulations, finding it within the scope of the Customs Act and not in violation of constitutional provisions. The challenge to the regulation, brought by DIAL, was dismissed. The court emphasized DIAL&#039;s ability to seek guidance from the Central Government regarding customs authorities&#039; directions, ultimately leading to the petition&#039;s dismissal with no costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334446</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>