<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 945 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187968</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order except for the interest payable on the reversed Cenvat credit, which was to be verified and demanded accordingly. The Tribunal found no evidence of clandestine removal, accepted the appellant&#039;s explanations for stock discrepancies, and reversed the Cenvat credit without imposing penalties. The decision was pronounced on 11-2-2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2016 12:01:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=447600" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 945 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187968</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order except for the interest payable on the reversed Cenvat credit, which was to be verified and demanded accordingly. The Tribunal found no evidence of clandestine removal, accepted the appellant&#039;s explanations for stock discrepancies, and reversed the Cenvat credit without imposing penalties. The decision was pronounced on 11-2-2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187968</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>