<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (12) TMI 7 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5677</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s decision that the funds provided by a lady relative were intended for the benefit of the entire family, making the properties joint family property. Consequently, the assessee was taxed as an individual of the Hindu undivided family due to the jointly held properties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=44760" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (12) TMI 7 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5677</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s decision that the funds provided by a lady relative were intended for the benefit of the entire family, making the properties joint family property. Consequently, the assessee was taxed as an individual of the Hindu undivided family due to the jointly held properties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5677</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>