<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 1162 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187967</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, M/s. Met Trade India Ltd. (MTIL), allowing the appeals related to the eligibility for common Central Excise registration for their two units, Unit-I and Unit-II, and the duty liability on Lead Ingots transferred between the units. The Tribunal emphasized the interlinked manufacturing processes between the units, justifying the common registration, and concluded that the duty liability issue was revenue neutral as the duty paid by Unit-I would be eligible as Cenvat Credit for Unit-II. The appeals were allowed, setting aside the orders denying common registration and duty liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2016 11:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=447591" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 1162 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187967</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, M/s. Met Trade India Ltd. (MTIL), allowing the appeals related to the eligibility for common Central Excise registration for their two units, Unit-I and Unit-II, and the duty liability on Lead Ingots transferred between the units. The Tribunal emphasized the interlinked manufacturing processes between the units, justifying the common registration, and concluded that the duty liability issue was revenue neutral as the duty paid by Unit-I would be eligible as Cenvat Credit for Unit-II. The appeals were allowed, setting aside the orders denying common registration and duty liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187967</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>