<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (2) TMI 14 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5675</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the Delhi High Court&#039;s decision in a case concerning the deduction of interest paid on borrowed funds for investment in shares under section 80K of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court emphasized that interest on borrowed capital should be deducted before applying section 80K, as per section 57(iii). The judgment clarified the computation of income for deduction purposes, resulting in the exclusion of the entire dividend income from the assessee&#039;s total income. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to allow the disallowed interest amount was affirmed, and the appeal by the Revenue was dismissed with no costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=44758" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (2) TMI 14 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5675</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the Delhi High Court&#039;s decision in a case concerning the deduction of interest paid on borrowed funds for investment in shares under section 80K of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court emphasized that interest on borrowed capital should be deducted before applying section 80K, as per section 57(iii). The judgment clarified the computation of income for deduction purposes, resulting in the exclusion of the entire dividend income from the assessee&#039;s total income. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to allow the disallowed interest amount was affirmed, and the appeal by the Revenue was dismissed with no costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5675</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>