<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 446 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334428</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the amendment to Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, introduced by the Finance Act, 2010, had retrospective effect. It also deemed the reopening of the assessment under Section 147/148 of the Act as valid. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, directing the deletion of the disallowance made under Section 40(a)(ia) as the TDS was deposited before the due date for filing the return. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2016 11:19:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=447572" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 446 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334428</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the amendment to Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, introduced by the Finance Act, 2010, had retrospective effect. It also deemed the reopening of the assessment under Section 147/148 of the Act as valid. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, directing the deletion of the disallowance made under Section 40(a)(ia) as the TDS was deposited before the due date for filing the return. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334428</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>