<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 442 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334424</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, stressing the importance of verifying the source of investment and the connection between speculation gain and the investment in shares of Buniyad Chemicals and Talent Infoways Ltd. The Tribunal ordered the deletion of the addition of Rs. 1,00,518/- if the assessee&#039;s claim was substantiated, highlighting the necessity to avoid double additions of the same income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2016 11:19:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=447568" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 442 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334424</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, stressing the importance of verifying the source of investment and the connection between speculation gain and the investment in shares of Buniyad Chemicals and Talent Infoways Ltd. The Tribunal ordered the deletion of the addition of Rs. 1,00,518/- if the assessee&#039;s claim was substantiated, highlighting the necessity to avoid double additions of the same income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334424</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>